“Boots on the ground” debunked

Every single wholesaler whose ever come to pitch me an international portfolio has made the case that having “boots on the ground” – meaning analysts located in overseas locations – would lead to outperformance relative to both the indices as well as the other foreign stock funds that maybe had less of these boots on the ground.

It doesn’t really work that way though. I do believe in the idea that overseas markets are, in general, less efficient than those here at home – if only for the reason that there are less people picking over these stocks than we have on Wall Street. They can also be less mature, less regulated markets and, as such, have more opportunities for savvy analysts and PMs with an information asymmetry to maneuver. Unfortunately, even while this may be true, none of it manifests itself in the form of outsized performance that is any way persistent or broad-based.

Actively managed international stock funds are every bit as unlikely to consistently outperform as their US counterparts.

Here’s S&P’s take, via two data points from their mid-year 2014 SPIVA Scorecard:

 

  • On the international front, approximately 70% of global equity funds, 75% of international equity funds, 81% of international small-cap funds and 65% of emerging market funds underperformed their benchmarks over the past one year.
  • For the first time since adding the International Equity category to the Scorecard, the report witnessed the majority of the international small cap managers underperforming the benchmark. The outcome was slightly more favorable when viewed over three- and five-year horizons, as over 50% of managers outperformed the benchmark.

Check out the more in-depth SPIVA Scorecard report below.

Source:

Indexology

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Ian commented on Nov 17

    .

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó.

  2. edward commented on Jan 25

    .

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó.

  3. thenaturalpenguin.com commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  4. bitcoin era review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  5. Devops solution commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  6. Auto Glass Anytime commented on Dec 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 17722 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  7. Regression Testing commented on Dec 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  8. buy clomid online usa commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  9. Gioteck Headsets manuals commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 25737 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  10. JVC VN-T216VPRU manuals commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  11. JVC Speaker sets manuals commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]

  12. go to this website commented on Feb 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/09/12/boots-on-the-ground-debunked-2/ […]