Psyched for Wednesday?

Something tells me the “supercommittee” may have been a bit too ambitiously named.

The supercommittee’s deadline to find a balanced package of spending cuts and tax hikes is this week, as per the terms set during the debt ceiling fiasco this summer.

I can’t see how this thing is going to play out but every reporter covering it is saying the two sides are moving further apart as we get to the deadline, not closer.

But we knew this would happen, right?

“It looks like a standoff,” said former Democratic U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan, who is now a lobbyist. “Nobody’s ever created a supercommittee where you have 523 members of Congress that are not involved and 12 who are working largely in secret,” he said. “It was generally a bad idea from the start.”

That’s from a Bloomberg story about the “widening rift” between the GOP and Dem representatives charged with finding a compromise.  In other words, what we put off in August is back to haunt us again.

But maybe a failure of the Super Committee isn’t such a bad thing.  Barry sent this my way yesterday, an opinion piece in the Washington Post by E.J. Dionne that explains how it could be good if both parties simply walk away without a deal:

Here is a surefire way to cut $7.1 trillion from the deficit over the next decade. Do nothing.

That’s right. If Congress simply fails to act between now and Jan. 1, 2013, the tax cuts passed under President George W. Bush expire, $1.2 trillion in additional budget cuts go through under the terms of last summer’s debt-ceiling deal, and a variety of other tax cuts also go away.

Now of course, where you stand politically will determine how you feel about that outcome.

But the more important question is: How will the market feel about that outcome?  We may be about to find out.

Sources:

Supercommittee Moving Further Apart as Talks Enter Homestretch (Bloomberg)

How we can succeed through supercommittee’s ‘failure’ (WaPo)

 

 

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. thenaturalpenguin.com commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  2. old facebook layout commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  3. bitcoin loophole review commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  4. 안전놀이터 commented on Oct 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  5. automated regression testing commented on Nov 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  6. quick service commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  7. 메이저놀이터 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 20383 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  8. dumps with pin commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]

  9. digital transformation solutions commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/19/psyched-for-wednesday/ […]