Case/Shiller Weaker than Expected, MoMo Traders Shrug

So 15 of the 20 cities measured by the just-out August Case/Shiller Index had sequentially down home prices.  So the +1.8% year-over-year gain leaves much to be desired.

Traders are asking “What the hell does that have to do with the price of rare earths metals in China?”

The thing about consistently negative and disappointing data is that after a while, you don’t get much of a reaction to it.  Like that crazy aunt you have to invite over every Thanksgiving; you already know that you’re dealing with a lunatic so when she shows up with lipstick smeared from ear to ear, a maniacal gleam in her eye and a cat on a leash, you don’t really freak out.

It is what it is.

In the meantime, traders don’t very much care about the housing market anymore.  They’ve become inured to the steady ebb and flow of weaker-than-expected everything that comes along whenever the discussion turns to housing and they’ve taught themselves to tune it out.  Housing-related stocks, banks included, have been forsaken by the hot money contingent for some time now.


“What do median home prices in Detroit have to do with middle class consumption trends in Latin America?”

“What does Miami’s condo glut have to do with the explosion in mobile web video?”

“What do housing problems in Arizona have to do with Ford’s $2.1 billion in 3rd quarter profits?”

“Why would the decline in California multi-family home prices distract me from the mass cloud computing migration, the app and tablet renaissance and the global smartphone explosion?”

Are trader’s dancing on the edge of a knife or are they actually asking the right questions?  The direction and breadth of the Nasdaq and various emerging markets indexes will give us our answer.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Bitcoin Era Review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  2. https://immediate-edges.com commented on Oct 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  3. blazing trader review commented on Oct 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  4. Harold Jahn Prosperity posted on Nov 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  5. Devops commented on Nov 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  6. 토토사이트 commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 92368 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  7. online td banking commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]

  8. Peavey PR 1500 manuals commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/10/26/caseshillerweaker-than-expected-momo-traders-shrug/ […]